******
******
******
Posted by DXer on November 7, 2011
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** Amerithrax, *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Bruce Ivins - Oct 4 2001, Robert Stevens | 34 Comments »
Posted by DXer on July 13, 2011
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** Amerithrax, *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Maureen Stevens, Robert Stevens | Leave a Comment »
Posted by DXer on May 19, 2011
******
******
read the entire article at … http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/7571742.html#ixzz1MoxdwCNy
******
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** Amerithrax, *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Gerard Andrews, Maureen Stevens, Robert Stevens, W. Russell Byrne | 14 Comments »
Posted by DXer on April 30, 2011
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** Amerithrax, *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Dr. Byrne's deposition, Maureen Stevens, Robert Stevens, stevens | 64 Comments »
Posted by DXer on April 30, 2011
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Dr. Andrews, Maureen Stevens, Robert Stevens | 6 Comments »
Posted by DXer on April 30, 2011
******
******
read the entire article at … http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/doubt-of-anthrax-suspects-role-resurfaces-in-lawsuit-1444809.html
******
In other words, there is no case against Dr. ivins. The Stevens’ law suit against the U.S. government is an opportunity to demonstrate that in a court of law, something the FBI conveniently by-passed by charging a dead man who could not defend himself.
So what really happened? And why doesn’t the FBI offer America a credible story?
As regular readers of this blog well know, I can imagine only 3 possible “actual” scenarios …
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** Amerithrax, *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Maureen Stevens, Robert Stevens | 12 Comments »
Posted by DXer on October 5, 2009
CASE CLOSED is a novel which answers the question “Why did the FBI fail to solve the 2001 anthrax case?” … click here to … buy CASE CLOSED by Lew Weinstein
Here’s what readers say about CASE CLOSED …
“CASE CLOSED reads fast and well. It could have happened just the way the author said. Full of intrigue mixed in with almost current events. The real people are just behind the fictional ones.”
“Author Lew Weinstein does a terrific job telling this fictionalized account of an inter agency post-mortem investigation of the (real) failed FBI investigation.”
******
On October 5, 2001, Robert Stevens, photo editor for American Media Inc. of Boca Raton Fla., died after being infected with respiratory anthrax.
Eight years have passed.
We don’t know why Mr. Stevens was chosen to receive an anthrax laced letter; no letter addressed to him or to AMI has been recovered.
And we don’t know why his murderers have yet to be brought to justice.
We do know that Dr. Bruce Ivins, accused by the FBI as the sole perpetrator of the anthrax attacks, has never, after 8 years of the most comprehensive investigation ever undertaken by the FBI, been linked to either Mr. Stevens or AMI.
Mrs. Maureen Stevens, the victim’s widow, has filed a $50 million lawsuit blaming the federal government for her husband’s death, alleging that the government’s lack of security allowed a mentally unstable man access to “some of the deadliest substances known to mankind.”
The U.S. government appealed to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, asking that Mrs. Stevens’ suit be dismissed.
In March of this year, U.S. District Judge Daniel T.K. Hurley in Florida refused to dismiss Stevens’ suit against the federal government and Battelle Memorial Institute, sending the case back to U.S. District Court in West Palm Beach.
******
Posted in * questioning the FBI's anthrax investigation, * recent anthrax news | Tagged: ** CASE CLOSED by Lew Weinstein, *** 2001 anthrax attacks, anthrax lawsuit vs US and Battelle, Robert Stevens | 14 Comments »