CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

Posts Tagged ‘ivins lab work in fall 2001’

* In 2001, FBI Kept Its Ames Anthrax In An Old Building In Virginia That Didn’t Have Secure Evidence Storage For Samples Before Or After Testing … Was it virulent?

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 7, 2012

******

******

Advertisements

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 3 Comments »

* GAO Should Obtain From The FBI The Laboratory Chain-Of-Custody Form that has a space that identifies who destroyed the Feb. 02 sample submitted by Dr. Ivins and states the reasons it was not preserved (such as the others that were preserved using different slants)

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 7, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 5 Comments »

* Were the Ames samples submitted by the DCLS/FBI to the Repository from Virginia Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services? What were the circumstances of the FBI having the Ames?

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 7, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 2 Comments »

* Did the FBI Scientist Throw Out The Other Slants That Did Not Use Specified TSA Remel Slant Or Only Dr. Ivins’ February 2002 Submission From RMR 1029 From Which Its Scientists Had Made A Dried Powder? Who Threw It Out?

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 7, 2012

******

******

******

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 20 Comments »

* GAO should obtain the very best contemporaneous documentation relating to Dr. Ivins specific activities with the guinea pigs, mice and rabbits on the nights that DOJ claimed, without evidence, that he was making a dried powder to mail.

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 6, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 3 Comments »

* excerpts from … October 2001 powerpoint by Bruce Ivins on “Evaluation of CpG Nucleotides for Protection against Anthrax”

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 6, 2012

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »

* In 2004, USAMRIID Advised The FBI That It Could Not Locate The Documents, Laboratory Notes Or Other Papers Of A USAMRIID Laboratory Technician Who Participated In the “Biological Warfare Decontamination Efficacy Study”. Who Was The Laboratory Technician? What Research Involving The Efficacy Of A Decontamination Agent Was Done?

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 5, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 22 Comments »

* GAO: With respect to the rabbit formaldehyde study in late Sep and early Oct 2001 involving Bruce Ivins and Patricia Fellows — nowhere mentioned by AUSA Lieber in her investigative summary — did Dr. Fellows address the study in the deposition that the Department of Justice required to be shredded?

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 4, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 7 Comments »

* Standard Operating Procedures for Animal Assessment and Monitoring: the beautiful Amerithrax AUSA did not appreciate that Dr. Ivins was tasked to do this the first week of October with 52 rabbits.

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 4, 2012

******

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 6 Comments »

* In an earlier experiment under the rabbit Protocol B00-03, the assistance of Dr. Ivins and two others was offered in connection with the bleeds over the two day period.

Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 4, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 5 Comments »