CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

Archive for January, 2016

* The FBI has responded to Dillon’s request for documents related to the lengthy Interim Major Case Summary

Posted by DXer on January 28, 2016

unnamed (28)


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | 17 Comments »

* Former Al Qaeda Anthrax Lab Director Agrees To Disclose Any Activities Detrimental To Country’s Safety As Condition Of Plea Agreement

Posted by DXer on January 27, 2016

Source: Ex-ISA detainee gets seven years jail for omitting information on terrorism …

unnamed (27)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »

* In recent filing, former Amerithrax lead investigator Richard Lambert makes powerful argument about FBI’s refusal to provide documents that it seized

Posted by DXer on January 21, 2016

unnamed (25)


Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 2.17.28 PM.png

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

* For the period 2004-2015, the recent Army report found no correlation between the viability test failure rate [50%] and the protocol or radiation dose

Posted by DXer on January 16, 2016

unnamed (24)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

* Virulent Ames genetically identical to the attack anthrax used in Fall 2001 mailings was at Dugway Proving Ground at Utah

Posted by DXer on January 16, 2016


Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments »

* Inquiry Faults Army Leadership in Anthrax Shipment

Posted by DXer on January 15, 2016

New York Times … JAN. 15, 2016

WASHINGTON — The Army on Friday issued a scathing critique of the management and oversight of a military laboratory that mistakenly sent live anthrax to facilities around the world, singling out a brigadier general and 11 other people for possible disciplinary action.

An investigation into the laboratory, at the Dugway Proving Ground in Utah, found that it often failed to test lab surfaces for contamination by biohazards, and that it employed a biosafety officer who lacked the education or training for the job. Staff members also “regularly manipulated data” about pathogens that were being shipped to outside facilities, including whether they had been rendered inert and were safe to handle without protective gear.

The report said that Brig. Gen. William E. King IV, who commanded Dugway from 2009 to 2011 and was a colonel at the time, had been unwilling or unable to take responsibility for the management problems.


“Colonel King was unwilling to take a deeper look at the operations he commanded, and ultimately perpetuated a complacent atmosphere,” the report said. “During the course of the investigation it was apparent that even now, Brigadier General King lacks introspection and fails to recognize the scope and severity of the incidents that occurred during his command.”

More broadly, the report said that the leadership at Dugway had played down “the seriousness of incidents and mishaps.”

“This level of complacency and failure to act cannot be tolerated in a zero-defect environment where the health and safety of employees and the public are involved,” it added.

Some of the people named for possible disciplinary action could be fired. The names of the 11 people other than General King — who is now commander of the 20th Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, Explosives Command — were blacked out in the report.

Maj. Gen. Paul A. Ostrowski, who led the investigation, told reporters that a variety of factors had led to the mistaken anthrax shipments. Along with the management problems, he cited gaps in the science behind the use of radiation to render anthrax spores inert without destroying them, which would make them useless to researchers.

Dugway was the largest producer of samples of inactivated anthrax in the United States before production was suspended last year. The conditions there first came under public scrutiny in May, after a commercial lab in Maryland tested a shipment from Dugway and found live bacteria.

The Pentagon said that Dugway shipped live anthrax to 194 other labs, including facilities in all 50 states and nine countries. It has stressed that the spores were sent in low concentrations and posed no threat to lab workers or the public, and that there was no criminal or malicious intent behind the shipments.

“Over the years, significant safeguards effectively ensured that the inadvertent shipments were not a threat,” the report released on Friday said.

In July, an initial Pentagon review found that the problems at Dugway were largely procedural, related mostly to insufficient testing and irradiation of anthrax samples. Officials emphasized at the time that the errors appeared to be the result of insufficiently robust testing protocols, not failures by any individuals.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

* AR 15-6 Investigation Report – Individual and Institutional Accountability For the Shipment Of Viable Bacillus Anthracis From Dugway Proving Ground

Posted by DXer on January 15, 2016

AR 15-6 Investigation Report – individual and Institutional Accountability For the Shipment Of Viable Bacillus Anthracis From Dugway Proving Ground, December 17, 2015


Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments »