* Ivins in June 2000 referring to Fed Ex – “If their dangerous goods person can’t invent some flaw with the paper work or packaging, they will be to you tomorrow”

* In 2006, Bruce Ivins’ was having Ames irradiated at 4 Mega Rads

* “More bad irradiation news” – USAMRIID’s Bruce Ivins found that sometimes samples that had tested negative then upon retesting came up “hot”

“More bad irradiation news” – USAMRIID’s Bruce Ivins found that sometimes samples that had tested negative then upon retesting came up “hot”

* A confidential human source reported to the FBI that Ivins did not use the proper paperwork in irradiating anthrax

* Is CDC going to tell USA Today’s Alison Young about the 2007 probe of the earlier misshipment of anthrax? Bruce Ivins asked: “Does this refer to any material that DPG sent here for irradiation, then was sent back?”

* more on the 2007 probe of the misshipment of anthrax that CDC does not want you to know about

* 2007 probe of misshipment that CDC doesn’t want you to know about

* Neither the FBI nor USAMRIID have produced these three notebooks even though they relate to use, storage and/or transfer of virulent Ames matching the anthrax mailed in the Fall of 2001.

* The FBI’s genetic analysis in Amerithrax rested on the UNVALIDATED scientific assumption that all samples that had been inactivated were in fact dead and that such samples thus could not have been the source of the virulent anthrax mailed shortly after 9/11.

* Dugway anthrax irradiation scandal – USAMRIID’s Bruce Ivins in 2008 recognized that a 50% check of samples “leaves us ‘better safe than sorry’ ” (as opposed to other’s insistence that only 10% was necessary)