* 1996 Assessment: USAMRIID was mainly concerned with animal activists and was underestimating the risk of a terrorist threat
Posted by Lew Weinstein on March 14, 2014
***
***
***
***
Advertisements
Posted by Lew Weinstein on March 14, 2014
This entry was posted on March 14, 2014 at 2:04 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. Tagged: USAMRIID risk of a terrorist threat. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
DXer said
FBI hunt for most-wanted domestic terrorist narrows to Hawaii
By Jana WinterPublished March 13, 2014FoxNews.com
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/03/13/fbi-hunt-for-most-wanted-domestic-terrorist-narrows-to-hawaii/
While San Diego has a distinctive tattoo on his chest that shows a round image of burning hillsides with the words “It only takes a spark,” and tattoos of burning and collapsing buildings on the sides of his abdomen and back, it is his behavior that could give him away. At the time of his disappearance, he ate neither meat nor any food containing animal products. The FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit believes if he has maintained this discipline, people around him may notice that he avoids consuming or wearing anything made with animal products.
A wanted poster distributed by the FBI tells more about San Diego.
“He is also known to cook and bake vegan and vegetarian foods and has an interest in sailing,” the poster states. “In the past, he has worked as a computer
network specialist and with the operating system LINUX. He may be using these skills as a form of income, specifically for cash to avoid using banks, checks and credit cards.”
Comment:
$250,000 bounty. Wow. Those tattoos qualify him as the stupid criminal of the year.
DXer said
CFAA CYA:
The title of the 1996 document is “Integrated Capabilities Assessment of the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Disease,” September 1996. It once was classified SECRET but then was unclassified. It is available from PACER in the Maureen Stevens v. United States docket.