CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

* evidence which contradicted the FBI’s spin was held for years AFTER Dr. Ivins committed suicide (2008) and the FBI one week later asserted he was the sole perpetrator of the 2001 anthrax attacks

Posted by Lew Weinstein on April 26, 2013

The FBI has no case against this man ... but meanwhile he is dead and the real perpetrators are still out there.

The FBI has no case against this man … but meanwhile he is dead and the real perpetrators are still out there.

***

USAMRIID eventually uploaded thousands of Dr. Ivins’ emails.

Produced months, even years, after Dr. Ivins committed suicide,

they contradicted the government’s assertions.

But by the time the Ivins exculpatory correspondence was produced,

Dr. Ivins was long buried and forgotten,

and interest in the FBI contradictions was virtually non-existent.

***

Advertisements

5 Responses to “* evidence which contradicted the FBI’s spin was held for years AFTER Dr. Ivins committed suicide (2008) and the FBI one week later asserted he was the sole perpetrator of the 2001 anthrax attacks”

  1. DXer said

    An email from September 2001 reportedly advised employees to bring home backups of their computers. Patricia Fellows and Anthony Bassett’s emails could help establish timeline regarding details of animal studies.

    Posted by Lew Weinstein on April 6, 2011
    https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/2011/04/06/an-email-from-september-2001-reportedly-advised-employees-to-bring-home-backups-of-their-computers-patricia-fellows-and-anthony-bassetts-emails-could-help-establish-timeline-regarding-details-o/

  2. DXer said

    The GAO is getting a taste of the FBI’s withholding as we speak — but one problem is that one doesn’t understand what has been withheld unless you have bear down on the computer forensics.

    Here, for example, note that the message is 0438.

    So if the GAO wants to understand what they STILL haven’t been provided by way of emails, they merely need obtain them with the number of the email displayed — and all the gaps will indicate emails still being withheld.

    Indeed, even the FBI’s computer forensics reports –and it doesn’t get more scientific than that — is a road map to documents that the FBI has withheld from the GAO.

    DOJ For 4 Years Withheld This Email (Message 0438) Written By Bruce Ivins On The Date Of Alleged Mailing Of Deadly Anthrax ; GAO Should Obtain A Full Set Of Emails From DOJ, Including Those That DOJ Has Still Failed To Produce
    Posted by Lew Weinstein on March 1, 2012

    https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/doj-for-4-years-withheld-this-email-message-0438-written-by-bruce-ivins-on-the-date-of-alleged-mailing-of-deadly-anthrax-gao-should-obtain-a-full-set-of-emails-from-doj-including-those-that-doj/

  3. DXer said

    There are lots of examples supporting your point but here are three. Now compare the first two emails to the Amerithrax Investigative Summary and you will see the DOJ does not even mention the rabbit study — which involved killing 52 rabbits that first week and required night and weekend work.

    In an Oct 5, ’01 email among the materials provided by USAMRIID this week, Dr. Ivins explains the results 3 days after the challenge of rabbits in the formaldehyde experiment; the word “rabbits” has never passed the prosecutor’s lips
    Posted by Lew Weinstein on December 24, 2011
    https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/2011/12/24/in-an-oct-5-01-email-among-the-materials-provided-by-usamriid-this-week-dr-ivins-explains-the-results-3-days-after-the-challenge-of-rabbits-in-the-formaldehyde-experiment-the-word-rabbits/

    In response to Dr. Ivins’ October 5, 2001 email discussing the rabbit deaths over the last three days, the participants in the study that day discussed by email the implications for further study
    Posted by Lew Weinstein on January 4, 2012
    https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/in-response-to-dr-ivins-october-5-2001-email-discussing-the-rabbit-deaths-over-the-last-three-days-the-participants-in-the-study-that-day-discussed-by-email-the-implications-for-further-study/

    GAO: Did Patricia Fellows Ever Find the Missing “National Security” Sample That Dr. Ivins Was (Apparently Falsely) Told Was From Iraq Before Moving On To SRI That Summer? Was There An Emailed Response(s) To Dr. Ivins’ Question? Her Deposition Should Not Be Shredded.
    Posted by Lew Weinstein on December 14, 2011
    https://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/gao-did-patricia-fellows-ever-find-the-missing-national-security-sample-that-dr-ivins-was-apparently-falsely-told-was-from-iraq-before-moving-on-to-sri-that-summer-was-there-an-emailed-resp/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: