CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

* After seeing the discovery he argued should be subject to a protective order, judging from comments to the press, Plaintiff’s Attorney in Stevens v. United States apparently agrees there is no reason that it remain sealed

Posted by Lew Weinstein on November 13, 2011

******

******

******

******

Advertisements

One Response to “* After seeing the discovery he argued should be subject to a protective order, judging from comments to the press, Plaintiff’s Attorney in Stevens v. United States apparently agrees there is no reason that it remain sealed”

  1. DXer said

    I have not yet asked for the civil depositions by the witnesses who testified about vulnerabiiities to the theft of pathogens. The latter depositions were subject initially to protective orders because they related to reports by Sandia and the IG. But when the protective order was lifted to those reports the protective order was lifted as to the depositions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: