CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

* Sandia Security Review of USAMRIID Fort Detrick

Posted by Lew Weinstein on November 4, 2011

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

Advertisements

4 Responses to “* Sandia Security Review of USAMRIID Fort Detrick”

  1. Zicon said

    I’m curious on how it would look if any biological lab military army or private were to be infiltrated, and how would that look on the US Governments part? So “Hypothetically” what if one could prove or show that either A.) It is still quite possible, B.) It has been done even after 2001 C.) For. National/Scientist D.) Mail Interception E.) Other / Unknowns / & of the infinate ways that could be a concept of someones unilateral wet dream.

    Not only how it would look but still “hypothetically speakiing” if any of those 5 “could” be proven, wouldn’t that destroy the FBI’s 10 year investigation, and basically trash most everything that has been written up on this matter??? Talk about the S-Storm that would create… or has it?

  2. Anonymous said

    This is from the main text on page 19.

    Although mass casualtes have not resulted to date, diversion and use of HCPTs has occurred.

    Furthermore, the fall 2001 U.S. anthrax attacks indicate that bioterrorists either possess or have access

    to relevant scientific expertise. Although detailed characteristics of the B. anthracis strain used in the

    attacks have yet to be publicly released, the unusually virulent nature of the strain,56 as well as the

    small particle size of the spores and unique coating, was a critical factor in the five reported deaths.

    Therefore, increased safeguards on certain highly virulent strains of B. anthracis and other HCPTs

    can decrease their risk of diversion, making it more difficult for the would-be terrorist or proliferator

    to develop a mass casualty biological weapons capability.

  3. DXer said

    This Sandia Final Report dated September 2002 states that the anthrax sent to the US Senators was “specially treated to eliminate static charge and promote aerosolization, but that the treatment could have resulted from past national biodefense activities.”

    • Anonymous said

      This Sandia Final Report dated September 2002 states that the anthrax sent to the US Senators was “specially treated to eliminate static charge and promote aerosolization, but that the treatment could have resulted from past national biodefense activities.”

      Just to put this in perspective. We have the electron microscopy group at Sandia led by Joe Michael as the FBI’s source on their insistence that the spores were not artifically treated. Sandia claim they “knew” this is early as February 2002. The FBI still insist this is the case today – and they aggressivley challenge the recent evidence that shows otherwise.

      And now we have a new document, unsealed today, that states a second group at Sandia wrote a report in September 2002 that states the spores WERE TREATED.

      Looks like its time for more DOJ damage control.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: