CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

* In Stevens litigation, PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Posted by Lew Weinstein on September 10, 2011

******

******

******

******

Advertisements

4 Responses to “* In Stevens litigation, PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL”

  1. DXer said

    Let’s turn to the new Wall Street Journal article before addressing the court filings.

    192 NOTICE by Maureen Stevens re 155 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint Under 28 U.S.C. 2680(a) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint Under 28 U.S.C. 2680(a) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint Under 28 U.S.C. 2680(a) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint Under 28 U.S.C. 2680(a) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint Under 28 U.S.C. 2680(a) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint Under 28 U.S.C. 2680(a) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint Under 28 U.S.C. 2680(a) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint Under 28 U.S.C. 2680(a), 173 Amended MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint (Based on the FTCA’s Assault and Battery Exception)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment (Based on the FTCA’s Analogous Private Liability Requirement and a Corresponding Lack of Cause-in-Fact) (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts)Amended MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint (Based on the FTCA’s Assault and Battery Exception)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment (Based on the FTCA’s Analogous Private Liability Requirement and a Corresponding Lack of Cause-in-Fact) (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts)Amended MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint (Based on the FTCA’s Assault and Battery Exception)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment (Based on the FTCA’s Analogous Private Liability Requirement and a Corresponding Lack of Cause-in-Fact) (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts)Amended MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint (Based on the FTCA’s Assault and Battery Exception)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment (Based on the FTCA’s Analogous Private Liability Requirement and a Corresponding Lack of Cause-in-Fact) (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts)Amended MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint (Based on the FTCA’s Assault and Battery Exception)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment (Based on the FTCA’s Analogous Private Liability Requirement and a Corresponding Lack of Cause-in-Fact) (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts)Amended MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 1 Complaint (Based on the FTCA’s Assault and Battery Exception)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment (Based on the FTCA’s Analogous Private Liability Requirement and a Corresponding Lack of Cause-in-Fact) (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts), 172 Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on the Absence of Proximate Cause (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on the Absence of Proximate Cause (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on the Absence of Proximate Cause (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on the Absence of Proximate Cause (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on the Absence of Proximate Cause (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts)Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on the Absence of Proximate Cause (with an AMENDED Statement of Facts) OF FILING REDACTED RESPONSES (Attachments: # 1 Response to DE155 per DE183, # 2 Response to DE172 per DE183, # 3 Response to DE173 per DE183)(Schuler, Richard) (Entered: 09/16/2011)

  2. DXer said

    09/15/2011 SYSTEM ENTRY – Docket Entry 191 restricted/sealed until further notice. (dj) (Entered: 09/15/2011)

    09/15/2011 SYSTEM ENTRY – Docket Entry 190 restricted/sealed until further notice. (dj) (Entered: 09/15/2011)

    09/15/2011 SYSTEM ENTRY – Docket Entry 189 restricted/sealed until further notice. (dj) (Entered: 09/15/2011)

    09/15/2011 SYSTEM ENTRY – Docket Entry 188 restricted/sealed until further notice. (dj) (Entered: 09/15/2011)

    09/15/2011 SYSTEM ENTRY – Docket Entry 187 restricted/sealed until further notice. (dj) (Entered: 09/15/2011)

    09/15/2011 SYSTEM ENTRY – Docket Entry 186 restricted/sealed until further notice. (dj) (Entered: 09/15/2011)

    09/15/2011 185 ENDORSED ORDER granting 184 Parties’ Joint Motion for Leave to Enlarge Page Limits for the Opposition and Reply re: the Government’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment 173 . The page limit for the plaintiff’s response in opposition to the motion is enlarged to forty-seven (47) pages, and the page limit for the government’s reply memorandum is enlarged to twenty-five (25) pages. Signed by Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley on 9/15/2011. (tda) (Entered: 09/15/2011)

    09/14/2011 184 Joint MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for the Opposition and Reply Addressing the Government’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment [DE# 173] by United States. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dinnell, Adam) (Entered: 09/14/2011)

  3. anonymous said

    What does this mean? Commentary please.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: