CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

* Who worked alone on the dried aerosol project in Building 1412 and what does he or she say about the research? Was virulent Ames ever made into a dried powder in Maryland or Virginia?

Posted by DXer on April 23, 2011



5 Responses to “* Who worked alone on the dried aerosol project in Building 1412 and what does he or she say about the research? Was virulent Ames ever made into a dried powder in Maryland or Virginia?”

  1. DXer said

    To suggest that there was not access to the genetically matching Ames in 1412 –as Dr. Majidi does in his new manuscript — is specious.

  2. DXer said

    In his presentation at the June 2012 conference at the NAS, Dr. Budowie says boop, boop, boop, that’s the source isn’t the reality.

    Identifying a particular tube that as the source is not realistic.

    He emphasizes the importance of figuring out what might be missing data.

    To study the vulnerabilities of an airplane in WW II, it’s not the planes that came back that you have to worry about. It’s the planes that didn’t come back.

    In Amerithrax, you want to focus on the samples of Ames that were not submitted.

    But Dr. Budowie is very learned and well-spoken on these subjects and can best address for himself his views of the nature of the uncertainties relating to distribution of virulent Ames in the Amerithrax case — that is, even before we get to the issue of uncertainties inherent in phylogenetics. His audio is uploaded and has been linked.

    And in attribution, he says that one should be slower to invade Canada than Iran — it is part of the process of fusing the scientific data with other information.

    And I expect that Dr. Budowie would agree that you do not want to be relying on as your central witness a woman who says at the time her actions were controlled by an alien who had implanted a microchip in her butt. If that witness comes running into the office and says “You must invade Canada!” it’s time to check your work carefully and do a careful analysis of the uncertainties.

    If someone insists that it is FACT that a First Grader wrote the letters, you have real interpretation problems that go far beyond the uncertainties inherent in phylogenetics.

    And if you learn that the lyophilizer really was not in the B3, and that Dr. Ivins really DID have reason to be in the lab those nights, and the witness feared she was being pursued by murderous astral Canadian entities, then don’t invade Canada.

    If you find that Renocal was used by Ivins but not in the mailed anthrax, give pause.

    If you find the anthrax may have been grown in silica, then look to see what might have explained the silica.

  3. DXer said

    Sometimes it takes 9 years for a tape recording to come out — a tape recording that then casts a mystery in an entirely different light. Sometimes media already has a copy of the tape recording.

    The question is: how did the deniers position themselves? Were they the ones who advised documents be withheld and information be suppressed?

  4. DXer said

    Why hasn’t major media requested the lab notebooks about this dried aerosol project at USAMRIID?

  5. DXer said

    Why is the FBI hearing about the dried aerosol work in Building 1412 in 2007 rather than 2002?

    Why weren’t these same people interviewed in 2002 – and if they were, where are those interview statements?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: