CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

* Where is the missing 100 milliliters of RMR-1029 reflected by February 2000 mathematical error?

Posted by DXer on April 6, 2011

******

******

2 Responses to “* Where is the missing 100 milliliters of RMR-1029 reflected by February 2000 mathematical error?”

  1. DXer said

    DEFENDANT UNITED STATES’ STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION (IN THE ALTERNATIVE) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (BASED ON THE FTCA’S ANALOGOUS PRIVATE LIABILITY REQUIREMENT AND A CORRESPONDING LACK OF CAUSE-IN-FACT), dated July 15, 2011, states in pertinent part:

    “9. There are no material facts that connect any “missing” or unsecured anthrax material to the anthrax spores that actually killed Mr. Stevens. Id.”

  2. Zicon said

    This also happened a second time within the past few years all scientist research was halted until the missing strain could be found, and was supposedly to have been a decimal point error in the wrong place in the actual paperwork.. Which still gets down to the security, that many decades ago when the host was made, who’s to say that something didn’t walk off long before anything was detected, or based on if something was found to be missing today doesn’t mean that anyone that (Could) have just walked in or intercept a small sample just to get a full breakdown of the cellular structure for study/infinite growth at another lab or government classified facility etc. etc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: