******
******
Archive for March 21st, 2011
* How did the percent of morphs in RMR-1029 compare to the percent in the Leahy sample? And if there was a discrepancy, what would explain it?
Posted by DXer on March 21, 2011
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Leahy sample, morphs in RMR-1029 | 5 Comments »
* FBI Special Agents took special care to make sure that no one learned that the FBI’s expert at USAMRIID had made a dried powder out of Flask 1029 … why?
Posted by DXer on March 21, 2011
******
******
******
LMW COMMENT …
When the FBI keeps vital information secret, it behooves us to know why they have done so. In particular, what connection is there between the withholding of this information and the FBI continuing to assert their unproven conclusion that “Dr. Ivins was the only person responsible for these attacks.”
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, dried powder at USAMRIID, USAMRID scientist John Ezzell | 4 Comments »
* The genetics inquiry just narrowed things from “over 700” to “up to 377” individuals who had access to Ames during the time of the 2001 mailings
Posted by DXer on March 21, 2011
******
******
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Ames access at time of mailing | 12 Comments »
* when did Anthony Bassett start working as the lab tech for Bruce Ivins?
Posted by DXer on March 21, 2011
******
******
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Anthony Bassett | 1 Comment »
* FBIR Sample 052-026 seized from Building 1425 was Dugway Ames (from Flask 1029) that had been given by Ivins to Susan Welkos, who reports that she didn’t typically share anthrax with other researchers.
Posted by DXer on March 21, 2011
******
******
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** FBI anthrax investigation, dugway, Dugway Ames, FBIR sample 052-026, Susan Welkos, USAMRIID RMR records - flask 1029 | 1 Comment »
* more about USAMRIID’s dried anthrax powder
Posted by DXer on March 21, 2011
******
The samples were received by Terry Abshire, who had been thanked by the DARPA researchers using the dried powder that the FBI’s anthrax expert had made from Ivins’ Flask 1029.
******
******
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** FBI anthrax investigation, dried powder at USAMRIID | 1 Comment »
* Flask 1029 was registered as #7737 at Building 1412 and #7738 was eventually found; but how was #7736 used up?
Posted by DXer on March 21, 2011
******
******
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** FBI anthrax investigation, USAMRIID RMR records - flask 1029 | Leave a Comment »
* Dr. Bruce Ivins reported that in Fall 2001 that even USAMRIID Command had no idea that Dugway was working with powdered (virulent) spores
Posted by DXer on March 21, 2011
******
******
******
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Dugway Proving Ground | 5 Comments »
* why did the FBI keep evidence of John Ezzell’s dried powder from the NAS?
Posted by DXer on March 21, 2011
******
Throughout the investigation the FBI kept secret that the FBI’s anthrax expert at USAMRIID, John Ezzell, had made a dried powder out of RMR 1029 (which was the flask used for all wet aerosol challenges with Ames at USAMRIID from 1997 until 2002). In the 9600 pages provided to the NAS, the FBI withheld all documents relating to this from the NAS. Did the FBI scientists do this for national security reasons — or to cover their ass?
******
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** FBI anthrax investigation, Dr. John Ezzell, dried powder at USAMRIID | 8 Comments »
* Analysis of Environmental sample from the American Media Inc. Building, Boca Raton, Florida
Posted by DXer on March 21, 2011
******
******
******
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** FBI anthrax investigation, American Media Inc Building | 3 Comments »
