CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

* Frederick News Post: the FBI’s case against Dr. Bruce Ivins is in tatters … *LMW: we must support Congressman Holt’s call for a re-investigation … we must learn the truth

Posted by Lew Weinstein on February 21, 2011

Congressman Rush Holt may be Dr. Bruce Ivins only chance for a deserved posthumous exoneration

******

today’s editorial in the Frederick News Post (2/21/11) …

  • concludes that the FBI’s case is in tatters and that America will probably never know if Ivins was guilty or not.

read the entire editorial at … http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/opinion/display_editorial.htm?StoryID=117013

******

LMW COMMENT …

  • The anthrax attacks in 2001 were a devastating blow to our national security.
  • Equally so is the FBI’s failed investigation of those attacks.
  • The real questions are …
    • Did the FBI actually fail to solve the case?
    • Was the FBI prevented from solving the case?
    • Does the FBI actually know who prepared and mailed the lethal anthrax (not Ivins) but for some reason is withholding the truth from the American people?
  • There is growing pressure (from Congressman Rush Holt and now others) to re-open the investigation.
  • It will be very hard to do so. The FBI is nobody’s patsie, and if they don’t want to say something, it will be very hard to force them to do so.
  • But exactly that path is the way we must go.
  • We must all support Congressman Holt and the few others who have begun to speak out.
  • We must get to the truth.

******

here is the opening scene from Lew’s novel CASE CLOSED …

this is the opening scene of Lew Weinstein's novel CASE CLOSED

******

* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon *

******

Advertisements

One Response to “* Frederick News Post: the FBI’s case against Dr. Bruce Ivins is in tatters … *LMW: we must support Congressman Holt’s call for a re-investigation … we must learn the truth”

  1. DXer said

    Has Dr. Vahid Majidi focused on the fact all the editorial boards seem to disagree with him?

    When in a recent poll, 80% indicate that they would vote to acquit, is it enough to trot out the same conclusory assertions without citations to the record in support in response to the issues that have been raised?

    How can he possible claim that Dr. Ivins’ time in the lab was unexplained without addressing the uploaded documentary evidence relating to the 52 rabbits that Dr. Ivins was working?

    I’ll tell you. Because he was not aware of them when he mistakenly and without adequate basis accused Dr. Bruce Ivins of murder.

    If you think he is familiar with the documents, then interview him about them.

    http://www.amerithrax.wordpress.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: