CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

Archive for October 4th, 2010

* is there no way to hold JAG or someone else responsible for what appears to be a purposeful withholding of information related to the FBI’s bogus investigation of the 2001 anthrax attacks?

Posted by DXer on October 4, 2010

welcome to Fort Detrick ... just don't expect any answers to your questions


DXer commented earlier today …

  • It is JAG that appears responsible for the withholding of documents for two years.
  • If all remaining documents are not produced this week, Congress should call a JAG witness to explain why they delayed production for two years and who made the decision at JAG to delay production of the documents.
  • A federal judge likely would sanction the JAG attorneys in a civil litigation context.
  • The practice of law should never involve hide-the-ball.
  • Taxpayers are paying the JAG salaries.  The lawyer responsible for withholding the documents works for taxpayers.


This whole affair is a disgrace.

The FBI’s case against Dr. Ivins is clearly bogus: no evidence, no witnesses, an impossible timeline, science that proves innocence instead of guilt.

So what really happened? And why? The “fictional” scenario in my novel CASE CLOSED has been judged by many readers, including a highly respected official in the U.S. Intelligence Community, as perhaps more plausible than the FBI’s unproven assertions.

* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon *

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | 36 Comments »