CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

Archive for June 22nd, 2010

* New release of Bruce Ivins emails from September 2004 – May 2005

Posted by DXer on June 22, 2010

.

The FBI’s case against Dr. Ivins is bogus: no evidence, no witnesses, an impossible timeline, science that proves innocence instead of guilt. So what really happened? And why? The “fictional” scenario in my novel CASE CLOSED has been judged by many readers, including a highly respected official in the U.S. Intelligence Community, as “quite plausible.”

* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon *

.

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

Advertisements

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | 9 Comments »

* USAMRIID promises new Ivins emails “shortly”

Posted by DXer on June 22, 2010

.

The FBI’s case against Dr. Ivins is bogus: no evidence, no witnesses, an impossible timeline, science that proves innocence instead of guilt. So what really happened? And why? The “fictional” scenario in my novel CASE CLOSED has been judged by many readers, including a highly respected official in the U.S. Intelligence Community, as “quite plausible.”

* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon *

.

After no response to my June 4 email, I sent another email this morning (June 22) …

JOHN Can you advise when the next batch of Ivins emails will be released, and what period they will cover? Thanks. LEW

JOHN’S RESPONSE  …

Batch 59-62 have been processed for release/posting to the website. They should be available shortly for viewing. September 2004 – May 2005.  498 pages.

******

I sent the following email to USAMRIID on June 4

JOHN

  • Documents are dribbled out (where are 2005-2008 emails?), attachments are not released with the appropriate emails, and far too much information is blacked out of what is released.
  • What justification does USAMRIID offer for its apparent continued violation of the FOIA law?
  • You have always been polite and responsive to my emails, but I am still left wondering why you and others should not be held responsible and perhaps even prosecuted for what appears to be willful dereliction of duty.
  • I’ll be happy to post your response and let your side of this story be known.

LEW

NOTE: spoliation of evidence is the intentional or negligent withholding, hiding, alteration or destruction of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding. It is a criminal act in the United States under Federal and most State law.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 31 Comments »