* could Bruce Ivins have solved the anthrax case? … maybe so, if he had been allowed
Posted by DXer on April 26, 2010
The FBI’s case against Dr. Ivins is bogus: no evidence, no witnesses, an impossible timeline, science that proves innocence instead of guilt. So what really happened? And why? The “fictional” scenario in my novel CASE CLOSED has been judged by many readers, including a highly respected official in the U.S. Intelligence Community, as “quite plausible.”
* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon *
.
From DXer …
According to an email to a colleague, Bruce Ivins thought it was an “incredible coverup” that he was not allowed to swab the Diagnostic Services Division at the same time he swabbed his lab and offices. He wanted the FBI to know of the form that he and a colleague had signed so that they could retrieve data before it mysteriously disappeared or was destroyed. Who in the Diagnostic Services Division did he think was trying to throw the blame from themselves to the Bacteriology Division?
******
Leave a Reply