CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

Archive for April 24th, 2010

* Is a network analysis that relies on Bruce Ivins’ publications sufficient?

Posted by DXer on April 24, 2010

.

The FBI’s case against Dr. Ivins is bogus: no evidence, no witnesses, an impossible timeline, science that proves innocence instead of guilt. So what really happened? And why? The “fictional” scenario in my novel CASE CLOSED has been judged by many readers, including a highly respected official in the U.S. Intelligence Community, as “quite plausible.”

* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon *

.

******

Is a network analysis that relies

on Bruce Ivins’ publications

sufficient?

******

Dr. Heine talks about the missing interviews from 2002 and says they, for example, focused on these experiments that were of the FBI’s keen interest.  He says that the FBI was focused on what happened to the samples.

  • Who was in Henry Heine’s group that did the experimenting with silicon or silicone?
  • When were the experiments done?
  • Who was involved?
  • Did the experiments involve Flask 1029?
  • What was the purpose of the experiments?
  • Were they the encapsulation and aerosolization experiments for which withdrawals were made from Flask 1029?

Advertisements

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 35 Comments »