CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks?

* a plea to President Obama … make the FBI come clean about its failed anthrax investigation

Posted by DXer on July 24, 2009

WHY did the FBI fail to solve the 2001 anthrax case?CASE CLOSED

WHO had the power to divert the FBI from the truth?

CASE CLOSED offers a fictional scenario that answers those questions

* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon



a plea to President Obama

… make the FBI come clean about its failed anthrax investigation


DXer, in his latest comment, raises serious and pertinent questions concerning the integrity of anthrax samples which are critical to the FBI’s conclusion that Dr. Ivins was the sole perpetrator of the attacks. DXer asks …

  • Was there adequate security?
  • Did unauthorized personnel have access to the samples?
  • Was there adequate accountability (i.e., chain-of-custody, evidence storage, evidence in-processing).
  • Who tested the sample that is claimed to have been a false sample submitted by Dr. Ivins?
  • Who chose to destroy the sample submitted using a different protocol.

DXer adds that former FBI Counterterrorism Chief Ben Furman wrote to him to say that Amerithrax was a mess but that he thought most information should be kept from the public.

DXer disagrees … so do I.


DXer’s questions, which are related to a recent interchange on the CASE CLOSED blog between Bugmaster and Ed Lake, go to the core of what appears to be the FBI’s clumsy cover-up of its failed anthrax investigation.

  • The FBI’s case against Dr. Ivins is, on its face, inadequate.
  • Senator Arlen Specter, among many others, has given his opinion as a former prosecutor that the FBI could never get a conviction on the basis of the evidence they have so far made public.

There must be something that makes the FBI delay and hide and continue to make itself look foolish …

  • The FBI is not incompetent; they must know that the case they have presented makes no sense.
  • It is not unreasonable to conclude that the FBI purposely accused a dead man in a press conference in order to avoid the necessity of a trial where evidence would be presented under oath and judged by a jury.
  • It is obvious that the FBI is refusing to tell the Congress and the American people what it knows about this case of mass murder and terrorism.
  • This may be the reason why it has still not “closed the case,” which would make its evidence (or lack thereof) subject to FOIA requests.

In my opinion, the FBI’s behavior, which is the core of the problem, is not rational UNLESS they are under orders to keep Congress and the public from knowing what really happened.

Which comes back to the two questions I raise in my novel CASE CLOSED …

Who benefitted from keeping the anthrax case unsolved?

Who had the power to divert the FBI from the truth?

In CASE CLOSED, I develop a fictional scenario to answer those questions, and the corruption of the FBI investigation in my story goes to the highest levels of the American government.

  • Do I think the story I portrayed in CASE CLOSED is what really happened?
  • I don’t make that claim. I have no way to know. I made up the story presented in CASE CLOSED, with no access to secret witnesses or documents.
  • But I do believe that something like what I portrayed did happen. It’s the only reason I can think of to explain the FBI’s otherwise bizarre behavior.
  • And many of the readers of CASE CLOSED find my story disturbingly plausible.

It seems to me, and to many others, that the FBI is hiding some terrible dark secrets.

We need Rush Holt’s Anthrax Investigation Commission to get out of the House Judiciary Committee and into action.

But I think we need more.

Who has the power to make the FBI tell the truth?

  • We need our new President, who I worked hard for and continue to support, and who I believe to be intelligent, thoughtful, courageous and well motivated, to step away from his reluctance to hold the Bush administration accountable for its many heinous misdeeds.
  • So I call upon President Obama, among his many daunting challenges, to demand that the FBI come clean about its anthrax investigation.
  • The integrity of the American government has been challenged by the FBI’s failed investigation and cover-up of the 2001 anthrax attacks.

Mr. President, please do what is needed to restore the integrity and pride in America which has been so wrongly debased by your predecessor.

Our country needs to know.

One Response to “* a plea to President Obama … make the FBI come clean about its failed anthrax investigation”

  1. DXer said

    Ed has often addressed this issue of the equipment likely used to process the anthrax and said precisely the opposite what he has said today.

    For example, Ed on December 13, 2003:

    ” It appears that the spores were soaked in some silica solution and then spray dried. … From what you write and from what I now know, it definitely looks very likely that it came from some liquid substance used to aid drying the spores via a spray dryer.”

    Ed on June 23, 2003

    “Freeze drying seems unlikely.”

    Ed on August 27, 2006 wrote:

    “However, that problem with van der Waals forces can be wholly or partially avoided with spray drying and other drying techniques, where each spore is dried individually. As mentioned last week, it’s done routinely in the manufacturing of Bacillusthuringiensis pesticides. However, spray drying and grinding can leave an electrostatic charge on the spores.”

    Why doesn’t Ed instead find and quote experts? His main expert Ken Alibek for years thought a spray dryer was indicated though he then came to think (in the draft of a chapter in Biohazard 2) that a fluidized bed dryer was used.

    Now what accounts for the change in Ed’s position? Perchance the fact that there was no mini-spraydryer in Bacteriology Division?

    Our information is that the closest match was the product made by Dr. John Ezzell at the Special Pathogens Testing laboratory for DARPA. He worked for the FBI’s Hazardous Materials Unit at the time. Oops. That would cause any FBI investigation to be a “mess” without more especially if he told General Parker that they did not make dry powdered anthrax (but only made wet aerosols).

    At his deposition in the Hatfill matter, does he address making dry powdered anthrax at Ft. Detrick?

    If you want to know what equipment could be used, it is a simple matter to rely on the equipment JE used.

    And ask yourself: Did Bruce Ivins have that piece of equipment in Building 1425? (The Bacteriology Division, for example, did not have a spray dryer (or mini-spraydryer).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: