* Stop the shredders! FBI has announced that it will be producing emails written by Bruce Ivins from September 2001 and October 2001 and make them available at vault.fbi.gov

******

******

* “Dr. Bruce Ivins’ newly produced 2006 emails related to the FBI Amerithrax investigation

.

The FBI’s case against Dr. Ivins is clearly bogus: no evidence, no witnesses, an impossible timeline. The real question is why the FBI persists in sticking to such a pathetic story. What are they hiding? I offer one “fictional” scenario in my novel CASE CLOSED, judged by many readers, including a highly respected official in the U.S. Intelligence Community, as “quite plausible.”

* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon *

******

******

January 30, 2006 email about

former Ames researcher

who worked with the material

moving to work for CIA

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

* from DXer … selected Bruce Ivins’ emails from 2003 … finally just released

.

The FBI’s case against Dr. Ivins is bogus: no evidence, no witnesses, an impossible timeline, science that proves innocence instead of guilt. So what really happened? And why? The “fictional” scenario in my novel CASE CLOSED has been judged by many readers, including a highly respected official in the U.S. Intelligence Community, as “quite plausible.”

* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon *

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

******

* from DXer (and FOIA) … new emails from Dr. Bruce Ivins

************

******

******

******

******

******

******

* another Ivins’ email … we have searched our records on the”Ames” strain

.

The New York Times says the FBI’s anthrax case has “too many loose ends.” Find out where some of those looses ends might have originated in my novel CASE CLOSED. Sure it’s fiction, but many readers, including a highly respected member of the U.S. Intelligence Community, think my premise is actually “quite plausible.”

* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon *

.

******

another Ivins’ email …

we have searched our records on the”Ames” strain

*****

* delay and more delay in the release of Dr. Bruce Ivins’ emails from the period of October 9, 2001 through November 30, 2001 … UPDATE: new emails have just been released

.

The New York Times says the FBI’s anthrax case has “too many loose ends.” Find out where some of those looses ends might have originated in my novel CASE CLOSED. Sure it’s fiction, but many readers, including a highly respected member of the U.S. Intelligence Community, think my premise is actually “quite plausible.”

* buy CASE CLOSED at amazon *

.

******

An email was sent today to JOHN PETERSON at U.S. Army Medical Command headquarters, asking…

• when will the next batch of Dr. Ivins’ emails be released?
• when the entire group from October/November 2001 will be available?

UPDATE: new emails have just been released

DXer COMMENT …

• Why has FBI Spokesman Michael Kortan countenanced the USAMRIID’s failure to produce Ivins’ emails from October 2001 and November 2001 for the past 1 1/2 years?
• Why would an individual touting the disclosures made by the FBI — correctly noting the number of pages — not feel a sense of responsibility that relevant documents were provided?
• The USAMRIID FOIA people (Ferrara, Peterson) have always said that the delay was due to FBI and DOJ interference.
• Given that no one is associating their name to the report other than Michael Kortan, isn’t he one to ask why they haven’t produced Ivins’ emails?
• At the very least, shouldn’t he be saying that the FOIA production is ongoing and that it is being expedited given the inexcusable 1 1/2 year delay?

******