CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks? … a search for the truth

Posts Tagged ‘*** Amerithrax’

* It’s time for a report from the GAO on their review of the FBI’s investigation of the 2001 anthrax attacks … it is time for the Government Accountability Office to itself be accountable

Posted by Lew Weinstein on February 26, 2013

GAO, FBI, Ivins

UPDATE 2/26/13

Another 3 months have passed. There is no GAO report. There is no indication as to when, or if, a report will ever be issued. This is a disgrace, which more and more looks like a cover-up. Who is afraid of the truth?

***

UPDATE 11/20/12

What we have now learned is that the GAO has apparently

not even started its investigation, more than a year

after they said it would likely be completed.

We’re trying to get a reaction and statement from Congressman Holt’s office.

******

The GAO began its review of the FBI’s investigation of the 2001 anthrax attacks in March 2011. At the time they said a report was expected in September 2011. We are now well past that deadline.

DXer believes the longer the GAO takes the better the job they will do. I disagree. I think the longer they take, the more interest will wane, and the more likely there will never be a report, and the whole matter will just fade away.

It is abundantly clear, from this blog and from many other sources, that the FBI’s assertion that Dr. Bruce Ivins was the sole perpetrator of the 2001 attacks, or even that he was involved in any way, is not proven by the evidence the FBI has issued in support of their allegations. The NAS, for instance, was clear that the scientific evidence the FBI said proved Ivins was the perpetrator did no such thing.

The crime is too serious, the current and future implications too dire, to simply leave the matter with a flawed FBI conclusion. America deserves better. It is time for GAO to speak, at the very least to issue a progress report, indicating what they have looked at, what remains to be reviewed, and when they think they will complete their task. 

In other words, it is time for the Government Accountability Office to itself be accountable.

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , | 131 Comments »

* Amerithrax Science Update (B3D1, p. 270) States that Missions By FBI Personnel Detected DNA from the Ames strain of Bacillus anthracis on both the May 2004 and November 2004 Missions; Samples From The First Mission Were Processed By NBFAC and Samples From the Second Mission Were Processed At Aberdeen Proving Ground

Posted by Lew Weinstein on November 24, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | 24 Comments »

* Bioweapons expert Jonathan Tucker noted in his 2010 NATO briefing that skeptics had pointed out numerous holes in the FBI’s “Ivins Theory” (and see 2013 book)

Posted by Lew Weinstein on November 5, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 2 Comments »

* 302 Statement: Seed Stock Used To Grow More Ames Was IVINS’ Spore Stock And Was Not Frozen; The Prosecutors’ Assertions To The Contrary Are Not Supported By Any Lab Notebook

Posted by Lew Weinstein on November 5, 2012

******

******

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 3 Comments »

* GAO Should Obtain A Copy Of This Disk Of Ivins Digital Evidence Review From FBI

Posted by Lew Weinstein on November 5, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 3 Comments »

* Deposition of Director of FBI Laboratory Dwight E. Adams (excerpt)

Posted by Lew Weinstein on November 3, 2012

******

******

******

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

* Oct 26, 2012 journal article discussing Amerithrax forensics and the need for objective, scientifically-based criteria

Posted by Lew Weinstein on November 1, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | 110 Comments »

* New GAO Conclusion: Federal Agencies Still Lack Validated Detection Methods Which Allow Confidence Statement Regarding A Negative Result

Posted by Lew Weinstein on October 23, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | 6 Comments »

* In regard to this October 5, 2001 lab notebook entry, GAO should publish its interview of AUSA Lieber in which she explains when she thinks the numbers referred to on the next page were created and why she didn’t mention the 52 rabbits in her Investigative Summary — why she claimed he had no reason to be in that lab at night that week.

Posted by Lew Weinstein on October 16, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | 7 Comments »

* GAO: With regard to this form about the 52 rabbits posted by Dr. Ivins on October 4, 2001 in his lab notebook, the name of the other person should be disclosed; the form attached Animal Protocol B01-11 to be followed.

Posted by Lew Weinstein on October 16, 2012

******

******

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.