* From a typical “Record of Controlled Substance (II-V) Administered/DIspensed, one knows the protocol number, the person dispensing, and the amount dispensing — did FBI Agent Edward Montooth and AUSA Rachel Lieber access these records before publicly charging that Dr. Ivins had no reason to be in the lab on those nights? If not, why not? The DEA Controlled Substance records kept by Dr. Ivins were available to the FBI and were admissible in federal court. « CASE CLOSED … what really happened in the 2001 anthrax attacks? … a search for the truth

* From a typical “Record of Controlled Substance (II-V) Administered/DIspensed, one knows the protocol number, the person dispensing, and the amount dispensing — did FBI Agent Edward Montooth and AUSA Rachel Lieber access these records before publicly charging that Dr. Ivins had no reason to be in the lab on those nights? If not, why not? The DEA Controlled Substance records kept by Dr. Ivins were available to the FBI and were admissible in federal court.

Posted by Lew Weinstein on December 11, 2011

******

This entry was posted on December 11, 2011 at 8:07 am and is filed under Uncategorized. Tagged: *** 2001 anthrax attacks, *** Amerithrax, *** Dr. Bruce Ivins, *** FBI anthrax investigation, ivins lab work in fall 2001. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s