<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: * Fox News &#8230; FBI&#8217;s Evidence in Anthrax Attacks Case Leaves Puzzling Scientific Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/fox-news-fbis-evidence-in-anthrax-attacks-case-leaves-puzzling-scientific-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/fox-news-fbis-evidence-in-anthrax-attacks-case-leaves-puzzling-scientific-questions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Atlantic</title>
		<link>http://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/fox-news-fbis-evidence-in-anthrax-attacks-case-leaves-puzzling-scientific-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Old Atlantic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caseclosedbylewweinstein.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RMR 1029 flask contains some growths done prior to 2001 by Ivins in his glovebox using the materials at Ft. Detrick using the procedure Ivins used there.  They don&#039;t contain the chemical additives in the letters.

If Ivins repeated the same procedure, with the same ingredients in his glove box in his lab he would produce the same RMR 1029 without the additives.  Why would he add these additives?  Were the additives available in Ivins area?  Are they there now?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RMR 1029 flask contains some growths done prior to 2001 by Ivins in his glovebox using the materials at Ft. Detrick using the procedure Ivins used there.  They don&#8217;t contain the chemical additives in the letters.</p>
<p>If Ivins repeated the same procedure, with the same ingredients in his glove box in his lab he would produce the same RMR 1029 without the additives.  Why would he add these additives?  Were the additives available in Ivins area?  Are they there now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
